When
one talks about India and Pakistan the immediate reaction click in our mind
says the two cocks fighting with each other. Why is that so? Why we are still
reluctant to see India’s progress and why India got envious of the Pakistan
being more powerful nuclear power. This is all because of our mindset which is
not ready to accept each other. Whether it is India or Pakistan, both have
recognized each other as rivals. Why it seems impossible to straighten out the
complexities.
There
is much more to say. India Pakistan diplomatic relations are so wide in a way
that we can hold endless talks on it. Problem is everywhere, but matter
resolves somehow but why India Pak issues are still pending? Does no one want
to settle it out? Or are there other elements that create barrier in smooth
ongoing relations. May be they are afraid that if Indian and Pakistani patch
up, their combined power would be stronger than the rest of the world.
Japan
and US are today strategic partners even after Hiroshima and Nagasaki disaster.
Even Europeans fought deadly wars many
times, but they are on a stage which is little more matured. France, Italy,
England and Germany are now working together in cooperation for the mutual
development of the region and hence Europe in turn, despite of being involved
in world wars against each other.
It’s
not like that both countries are reluctant to solve their differences. Instead
in past many bilateral talks were held even US served as a mediator. Bhutto’s
first government took steps to normalize relations with India. Nawaz Sharif’s
most significant step towards bilateral rapprochement came during his second
tenure when he signed the Lahore declaration with his Indian counterpart Atal
Bihari Vajpayee in which both the countries agreed to intensify their efforts
to resolve all issues including the issue of Kashmir.
As
with Bhutto’s, Sharif’s efforts to make peace with India were scuttled as the
Kargil War broke out in May 1999 which left all over unsolved. However
Musharraf also played key role in maintaining the peaceful relations. Whereas The
PPP’s efforts to resume the composite dialogues came to an abrupt halt
following the 26 November 2008 terror attacks in Mumbai. Mumbai attacks marked
the seething anger among both the countries. In reaction of which India put an
immediate stop to all goodwill gestures, trade links and political dialogue
with Pakistan. This was clearly no time for niceties. However charged Ajmal
Qasab has now been hanged in India’s jail. Can we hope this chapter will close
onwards? I guess no as India wants complete terrorism wipe out.
Nevertheless
Kashmir is the basis of all enmity between both the countries. Both are
spending huge sums over this issue which could be better utilized elsewhere.
Although we have many problems but we want the issue to settle out. The word
compromise seems good on a paper to make Kashmir independent as what the
Kasmiris and most of Pakistanis want. But it’s highly impractical because of the
complex and volatile politics of this region and because of the fact that
neither India, nor Pakistan would be prepared to give up one square inch of
Kashmiri land. Anyhow Pakistan wants the bone of contention to resolve but
India doesn’t even bother about it as it has complete army control over it. It’s
high time for the egos to put down, to face the facts and find a reasonable
solution to the problem.
There
has also been taken numerous non-governmental efforts to normalize relations.
Launched by two leading Indian and Pakistani media enterprises in January 2010,
The Times of India and The Jang Group respectively, the Aman ke Asha (Hope for
Peace) initiative promotes a range of activities including cultural programs
such as concerts and literary shows which has the potential to boost the
relations.
On a
3-day visit of Pakistan, The Indian Foreign Minister S.M.Krishna with her
counterpart Hina Rabbani Khar signed a much awaited visa accord. The
liberalization of visa constitutes an important facet of any bilateral
relationship as it facilitates movement of people, encourages exchange of
views, and most importantly, contributes to lowering of the walls of distrust.
Moreover
both the countries have recognized the core value of Trade between each other
which is seen as a ray of hope. “Trade Diplomacy” will probably play a large
part in the future development of the Indo-Pak relationship and that’s very
well considering the economic situation in Pakistan. Major advantages for the
Pakistani as well as the Indian economy include cheaper transportation costs
due to shorter distances, making it unnecessary for the industries to carry
large inventories of raw materials and intermediate goods, thus reducing
operation costs. The normalization of Trade relations with India would “open a
hitherto stalled growth node for the Pakistani economy”, said political
economist Asad Sayeed.
Water
issue is very contentious between both the countries which was somehow resolved
through UN with the treaty signed “Indus Water Treaty” (IWT). Afterwards India
constructed as many hydro projects as she could and are made as such which
effect the Pakistan’s IWT- guaranteed access to water. The manipulation of IWT
provisions by India and growing water scarcity in Pakistan can lead both the
countries toward an armed conflict. However improved economic ties and the
resultant easing of tensions would provide more conducive environment to work towards
resolving water disputes. Simultaneously both the countries should make a
regular practice to free each other’s prisoners time to time which will
ultimately result in strengthening of peaceful relations.
India’s most polarizing rightwing politician Bal
Thakrey whose visceral
hatred of Pakistan matched his adulation of Adolf Hitler died
from the lung ailment. We can hope that anti Pakistan and anti Muslim legacy
will finish and hostility will die with the burial of Bal Thakrey and the new
leadership of his party will diminish Muslim animosity and endeavor better
relations between India Pakistan.
In Italy, for thirty years under the Borgias,
they had warfare, terror, murder and bloodshed, but they produced Michelangelo,
Leonardo da Vinci and the Renaissance. Anything is possible if our thinking is
optimistic. Because pessimistic minds lead no where but to misunderstandings
and problems. We can hope for the best that both the neighbors one
day, in the distant future, may meet at destination peace.
No comments:
Post a Comment